might not intervene, it tries to deter Taiwan from taking provocative actions. might intervene militarily, the policy of strategic ambiguity seeks to deter China from attacking Taiwan while at the same time, by leaving the possibility that the U.S. has taken the position that it does not actively support Taiwan’s de jure independence.īy leaving open the possibility that the U.S.

On the other hand, consistent with the recognition of the government of the People’s Republic of China as “the sole legal government of China,” the U.S. switched diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing, but through the passage of the Taiwan Relations Act, it promised to continue supporting Taiwan’s efforts to defend itself. policy toward cross-strait issues is generally described as a policy of “strategic ambiguity.” Under this, Washington has deliberately remained ambiguous on when and how it would intervene to defend Taiwan in order to prevent both Beijing and Taipei from taking provocative or venturesome steps. and Japan regarding the Taiwan issue have been formed under different historical and strategic backgrounds.

In order to encourage China to continue thinking the issue of Taiwan can only be resolved through peaceful means rather than by force, Japan and the United States are facing an urgent need to consider and quietly prepare responses to possible contingencies in Taiwan and put them forward as part of a deterrence strategy toward China. and China, and across the Taiwan Strait, is coming to an end, however, more people are calling for both the United States and Japan to rethink their ambiguous positions. As China boosts its military capabilities and the era of conciliatory moods between the U.S.

The time has come execute order 66